Re: Redirect "git" subcommand to itself?
- From
- Konstantin Khomoutov <kostix+git@007spb.ru>
- Date
- May 28, 2015, 10:36 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20150528133625.bfececc222a4820e9fb27aaa@domain007.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAGZ79kZHa9wUrRsWfHgGdSdx+cN9VAirAAfu3YLVTuSmggcehg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 27 May 2015 17:28:34 -0700 Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> wrote:
> so I just run into this problem again (which happens to me maybe > twice a week): I want to do a git operations, so I type "git " into > my shell,
[...]
Show 5 quoted lines
> then I copy the whole operation "git revert --abort" in this case and > paste it to the shell and let go. > The result looks like > $ git git revert --abort > git: 'git' is not a git command. See 'git --help'.
[...]
> I wonder if we want to make a "git" subcommand, which behaves exactly > the same as git itself? > Then "git git git status" would just return the same as "git status".
In your ~/.whateverrc, put this:
git() {
while [ $# -gt 0 ]; do
test "$1" != "git" && break;
shift;
done;
command git $@;
}This assumes a POSIX-compatible shell but I think you've got the idea. ("command" is a builtin which forces interpreting the following word as the name of an external program.)