Re: Redirect "git" subcommand to itself?
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- May 28, 2015, 05:22 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20150528052227.GA24895@peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqoal5ii21.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 06:53:26PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> > I wonder if we want to make a "git" subcommand, which behaves exactly > > the same as git itself? > > Then "git git git status" would just return the same as "git status". > > A few unrelated thoughts. > > * Perhaps we should omit 'git' from these advice-texts? E.g. > > use "revert --abort" to cancel > > I dunno.
Please don't. You help the set of people who type "git" and then paste the rest of the command at the expense of people who just paste the whole command. We don't know the relative numbers of those people, but we know there is at least 1 in each group. ;)
-Peff