Re: [PATCH 0/3] Another approach to large transactions
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Apr 22, 2015, 20:11 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20150422201126.GB29282@peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAGZ79kY_1JqKBiAL14me8ktqdQMJ1UuTy1_MgBY4jy5i_qX0uA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:14:08PM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> > FWIW, we already use a magic value of "25 extra" in open_packed_git_1. I > > don't know if that means the number has been proven in practice, or if > > it is simply that nobody actually exercises the pack_max_fds code. I > > suspect it is the latter, especially since d131b7a (sha1_file.c: Don't > > retain open fds on small packs, 2011-03-02). > > 25 is equally sound as I could not find any hard calculation on that > number in the > history or code. I will change it to 25 in the next version of the patch.
FWIW, I think 32 is just fine, too, and the patch doesn't need re-rolled because of this. I mostly wanted to point out that yes, indeed, we use this "eh, a few dozen is probably enough" strategy elsewhere. Which maybe, sort-of validates it. :)
-Peff