C99 (Was: Re: Freeing struct lock_file?)
- From
brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
- Date
- Apr 4, 2015, 19:04 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20150404190400.GB10125@vauxhall.crustytoothpaste.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <1428107083.31333.11.camel@ubuntu>
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 08:24:43PM -0400, David Turner wrote:
> But I can see why git wouldn't want to depend on that behavior. C11 has > a way to do this safely, but AIUI, git doesn't want to move to C99 let > alone C11. So I guess this will just have to remain the way it is.
I would really like to move to at least C99. However, MSVC bundles a C89 compiler and a C++ compiler, but Microsoft steadfastly refuses to bundle an actual C99 compiler, and Git doesn't even come close to compiling as C++. Newer versions of MSVC (2013 and newer) support enough of the features, though, that it might be possible.
So it isn't as much of a "we don't want to move to C99" as much as "we aren't yet willing to drop support for older versions of MSVC". I don't use Windows, so I'm happy to drop support for MSVC 2012 and older, but others may have different opinions.
-- brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US +1 832 623 2791 | http://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only OpenPGP: RSA v4 4096b: 88AC E9B2 9196 305B A994 7552 F1BA 225C 0223 B187