Re: git 2.2.x: Unexpected, overstrict file permissions after "git update-server-info"
- From
- Paul Sokolovsky <paul.sokolovsky@linaro.org>
- Date
- Jan 6, 2015, 12:12 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20150106141211.2ad83df4@x230>
- In-Reply-To
- <20150106034702.GA11503@peff.net>
Hello,
On Mon, 5 Jan 2015 22:47:02 -0500 Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
Show 17 quoted lines
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 09:07:24PM +0200, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: > > > So, after the upgrade, users started to report that accessing > > info/refs file of a repo, as required for HTTP dump protocol, leads > > to 403 Forbidden HTTP error. We traced that to 0600 filesystem > > permissions for such files (for objects/info/packs too) (owner is > > gerrit user, to remind). After resetting permissions to 0644, they > > get back to 0600 after some time (we have a cronjob in addition to > > a hook to run "git update-server-info"). umask is permissive when > > running cronjob (0002). > > > > I traced the issue to: > > https://github.com/git/git/commit/d38379ece9216735ecc0ffd76c4c4e3da217daec > > Yeah, I didn't consider the mode impact of using mkstemp. That is > definitely a regression that should be fixed. Though of course if you > really do want 0644, you should set your umask to 0022. :)
Well, group permissions are ok - we just need it to be world-readable, and that's not random, but complies with hosting requirements - our repos are public otherwise.
Show 9 quoted lines
> > It says: "Let's instead switch to using a unique tempfile via > > mkstemp." Reading man mkstemp: "The file is created with > > permissions 0600". So, that's it. The patch above contains call to > > adjust_shared_perm(), but apparently it doesn't promote restrictive > > msktemp permissions to something more accessible. > > If you haven't set core.sharedrepository, then adjust_shared_perm is a > noop. But you shouldn't have to do that. Git should just respect your > umask in this case.
My reference to adjust_shared_perm() was because I initially wanted to write "apparently, it makes sense to do chmod after mkstemp()", but I spotted that there's adjust_shared_perm() already, which does some shuffling of permissions.
Show 6 quoted lines
> > Hope this issue can be addressed. > > Patches to follow. Thanks for the report. > > [1/2]: t1301: set umask in reflog sharedrepository=group test > [2/2]: update-server-info: create info/* with mode 0666
Thanks much for the prompt reply and patches!
> > -Peff
-- Best Regards, Paul Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog