Re: [PATCH 20/23] reflog_expire(): new function in the reference API
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Dec 12, 2014, 08:50 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20141212085022.GA11891@peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <548AA5E9.9090201@alum.mit.edu>
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:23:05AM +0100, Michael Haggerty wrote:
Show 18 quoted lines
> On 12/09/2014 12:32 AM, Stefan Beller wrote:
> >> +enum expire_reflog_flags {
> >> + EXPIRE_REFLOGS_DRY_RUN = 1 << 0,
> >> + EXPIRE_REFLOGS_UPDATE_REF = 1 << 1,
> >> + EXPIRE_REFLOGS_VERBOSE = 1 << 2,
> >> + EXPIRE_REFLOGS_REWRITE = 1 << 3
> >> +};
> >
> > Sometimes we align the assigned numbers and sometimes we don't in git, so an alternative would be
> >
> > enum expire_reflog_flags {
> > EXPIRE_REFLOGS_DRY_RUN = 1 << 0,
> > EXPIRE_REFLOGS_UPDATE_REF = 1 << 1,
> > EXPIRE_REFLOGS_VERBOSE = 1 << 2,
> > EXPIRE_REFLOGS_REWRITE = 1 << 3
> > }
> >
> > Do we have a preference in the coding style on this one?I think vertically aligned lists look really nice. But they often wreak havoc with diffs, because introducing one longer line means re-aligning the whole thing. IMHO, it's not worth it (but if you're going to do it, leave lots of extra room for expansion).
Just my two cents, of course. I don't recall this particular style point coming up before.
Show 8 quoted lines
> Both styles are used in our codebase, and I don't think the style guide > says anything about it. My practice in such cases is: > > * If I'm modifying existing code, preserve the existing style (to avoid > unnecessary churn) > * If most of our code uses one style, then use that style > * If our code uses both styles frequently, just use whatever style looks > better to me
I think that is a very good philosophy in general.
-Peff