Re: [PATCH 2/9] strbuf: add strbuf_tolower function
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- May 22, 2014, 18:41 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20140522184113.GC1167@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqq38g1oe2y.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:36:37AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> > Yes, and that would be fine with me (I actually wrote strbuf_tolower for > > my own use, and _then_ realized that we already had such a thing that > > could be replaced). > > Do we forbid that sb->buf[x] for some x < sb->len to be NUL, and if > there is such a byte we stop running tolower() on the remainder?
Christian brought this up elsewhere, and I agree it's probably better to work over the whole buffer, NULs included. I'm happy to re-roll (or you can just pick up the version of the patch in this thread), but I think the bigger question is: is this refactor worth doing, since there is only one caller?
-Peff