Re: [PATCH v6] format-patch --signature-file <file>
- From
Jeremiah Mahler <jmmahler@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 21, 2014, 22:27 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20140521222701.GA24537@hudson.localdomain>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqfvk2ok10.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 03:15:55PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes: > > Yeah, placing it in its own setup may be the best. There are quite > a many set-ups outside the tests in this script from the olden days, > so I am OK if left it as-is and have a separate clean-up patch after > this topic settles. I am also OK to add a new one "the new right way" > so that a later clean-up patch does not have to change what is added > in this step.
I like the idea of limiting the scope of this data so it couldn't inadvertently impact later tests.
But placing the same data inside multiple test cases creates duplication.
Is there a way to define data once for a limited set of tests?
-- Jeremiah Mahler jmmahler@gmail.com http://github.com/jmahler