Re: [PATCH 3/4] rebase: test ack
- From
- Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
- Date
- May 21, 2014, 12:52 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20140521125246.GA21476@redhat.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqvbt01o14.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 08:13:27AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 13 quoted lines
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes: > > > Just to clarify I can post v2 of 4/4 without reposting 1-3 since they > > are queued? > > If you need to update anything queued only on 'pu' but not yet in > 'next', it is customary to resend the whole for everybody to see > (what is already in 'next' should only be built upon incrementally > and not updated with replacement patches), while noting which ones > are the same as before. Christian Couder has been doing it nicely > in his recent rerolls (if the series were not in 'next', that is). > > Thanks.
Actually I don't see anything like it in pu. What I would like is for 1-3 to be in pu, 4/4 was for illustrative purposes it's not yet ready for that, and 1-3 are useful by themselves. I could then iterate on 4/4 without reposting 1-3.