From: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 12:52:46 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] rebase: test ack
Message-ID: <20140521125246.GA21476@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqvbt01o14.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>

On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 08:13:27AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes:
> 
> > Just to clarify I can post v2 of 4/4 without reposting 1-3 since they
> > are queued?
> 
> If you need to update anything queued only on 'pu' but not yet in
> 'next', it is customary to resend the whole for everybody to see
> (what is already in 'next' should only be built upon incrementally
> and not updated with replacement patches), while noting which ones
> are the same as before.  Christian Couder has been doing it nicely
> in his recent rerolls (if the series were not in 'next', that is).
> 
> Thanks.

Actually I don't see anything like it in pu.
What I would like is for 1-3 to be in pu,
4/4 was for illustrative purposes it's not yet
ready for that, and 1-3 are useful by themselves.
I could then iterate on 4/4 without reposting 1-3.