Re: Output from "git blame A..B -- path" for the bottom commit is misleading
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- May 8, 2014, 21:26 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20140508212647.GA6992@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqq8uqc2dt5.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 01:52:38PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> ( 103) > 7bbc458b (Kyle J. McKay 2014-04-22 04:16:22 -0700 104) test_expect_... > ( 105) test... > 7bbc458b (Kyle J. McKay 2014-04-22 04:16:22 -0700 106) git ... > ( 107) test... > > which does away with the misleading information altogether. > > I myself is leaning towards the latter between the two, and not > overriding "-b" but introducing another "cleanse the output of > useless bottom information even more" option.
Though I rarely use boundary commits, this one makes the most sense to me (when I do use them, I just mentally assume that the information in the boundary line is useless; this is just making that more apparent).
Coincidentally, I recently came across a malformed commit that had a bogus empty committer name and email. The "git log" pretty-printer omits the author and committer lines entirely. "blame" will show "(unknown)" in the name field. I wonder if it should also switch to a formatted blank as above (but _do_ print the commit).
-Peff