Re: SSL_CTX leak?
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Mar 27, 2014, 23:11 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20140327231156.GE32434@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <CACnwZYdYYO2VXRnfyVD_uEeguYcBv-eFoYfawoCESDbcBVMhgA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:37:07AM -0300, Thiago Farina wrote:
> Do we leak the context we allocate in imap-send.c:280 intentionally?
It was never mentioned on the mailing list when the patches came originally, so I suspect is just an omission.
Presumably the SSL_CTX is needed by the connection that survives after the function, but my reading of SSL_CTX_free implies that the data is reference-counted, and the library would presumably handle it fine.
OTOH, it is probably not causing a huge problem (since we wouldn't end up freeing it until the end of the program anyway), so I would not personally devote to many brain cycles to figuring out how OpenSSL handles it.
-Peff