Re: [PATCH 3/3] wt-status: use "format" function attribute for status_printf
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Jul 12, 2013, 20:44 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20130712204437.GC5276@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vfvvjoj2h.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 09:10:30AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> > You can "fix" it with -Wno-zero-format-length, so the hassle is not > > huge. But I am also inclined to just drop this one. We have lived > > without the extra safety for a long time, and list review does tend to > > catch such problems in practice. > > I am tempted to actually merge the original one as-is without any of > the workaround, and just tell people to use -Wno-format-zero-length.
Yeah, I think the only downside is the cognitive burden on individual developers who try -Wall and have to figure out that we need -Wno-zero-format-length (and that the warnings are not interesting).
It would be nice to add it automatically to CFLAGS, but I do not know if we can reliably detect from the Makefile that we are compiling under gcc.
-Peff