Re: [PATCH 3/3] pull: introduce --[no-]autostash and pull.autostash
- From
John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
- Date
- Apr 15, 2013, 16:53 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20130415165352.GH2278@serenity.lan>
- In-Reply-To
- <CALkWK0nrVZo3MSgqpPmX2+T3JJ8uP=hzH3PMv+qd4ZaqNVwEsw@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:15:54PM +0530, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
> Junio's criticism of pull.autostash hurting pull-merge people is > cogent; my current plan is to ditch pull.autostash altogether, and > implement rebase.autostash for the reduced case of a non-interactive > rebase.
Why restrict it to non-interactive? I'd find it useful when doing interactive rebases as well - consider the case when you simply want to re-order some commits.