From: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 16:53:53 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] pull: introduce --[no-]autostash and pull.autostash
Message-ID: <20130415165352.GH2278@serenity.lan>
In-Reply-To: <CALkWK0nrVZo3MSgqpPmX2+T3JJ8uP=hzH3PMv+qd4ZaqNVwEsw@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:15:54PM +0530, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
> Junio's criticism of pull.autostash hurting pull-merge people is
> cogent; my current plan is to ditch pull.autostash altogether, and
> implement rebase.autostash for the reduced case of a non-interactive
> rebase.

Why restrict it to non-interactive?  I'd find it useful when doing
interactive rebases as well - consider the case when you simply want to
re-order some commits.