Re: [PATCH 3/6] t5516 (fetch-push): introduce mk_test_with_name()
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Mar 22, 2013, 21:14 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20130322211415.GI12223@google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vmwtv8p1c.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I would prefer to see a preparatory patch to teach mk_test/mk_empty > to _always_ take the new name (i.e. the result of your patch) and > then do whatever new things on top.
Yes, that sounds like a good way to go.
> By the way, I am planning to _not_ look at new stuff today. I'd > rather see known recent regressions addressed (and unknown ones > discovered and squashed) before we move forward, and I would > appreciate if regular contributors did the same.
I've been flushing out my thoughts to avoid forgetting them. ;-) Agreed, though. Thanks.