Re: Proposal: branch.<name>.remotepush
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 7, 2013, 23:30 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20130207233017.GD19397@google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CALkWK0=53riU3xKbKkyAVS8--9VoAU5P6h88MQ9-geW=H5+a-w@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Ram,
Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
> And yes, a regular `git push origin refs/for/master` is just retarded.
The usual incantation is "git push gerrit HEAD:refs/for/master". Is the code review creation push that uses a different branchname from the branch the integrator pulls what seems backward, or is it the need to specify a refname at all on the command line?
I agree that a "[branch "master"] pushremote" configuration would be handy. pushremote instead of remotepush to be less surprising to people who have already seen pushurl.
Good luck, Jonathan