From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 23:30:17 GMT
Subject: Re: Proposal: branch.<name>.remotepush
Message-ID: <20130207233017.GD19397@google.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALkWK0=53riU3xKbKkyAVS8--9VoAU5P6h88MQ9-geW=H5+a-w@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Ram,

Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:

> And yes, a regular `git push origin refs/for/master` is just retarded.

The usual incantation is "git push gerrit HEAD:refs/for/master".  Is
the code review creation push that uses a different branchname from
the branch the integrator pulls what seems backward, or is it the need
to specify a refname at all on the command line?

I agree that a "[branch "master"] pushremote" configuration would be
handy.  pushremote instead of remotepush to be less surprising to
people who have already seen pushurl.

Good luck,
Jonathan