Re: [PATCH v3 3/8] upload/receive-pack: allow hiding ref hierarchies
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Feb 5, 2013, 08:50 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20130205085047.GA24973@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <1359571542-19852-4-git-send-email-gitster@pobox.com>
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:45:37AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 14 quoted lines
> Teach upload-pack and receive-pack to omit some refs from their > initial advertisements by paying attention to the transfer.hiderefs > multi-valued configuration variable. Any ref that is under the > hierarchies listed on the value of this variable is excluded from > responses to requests made by "ls-remote", "fetch", "clone", "push", > etc. > > A typical use case may be > > [transfer] > hiderefs = refs/pull > > to hide the refs that are internally used by the hosting site and > should not be exposed over the network.
In the earlier review, I mentioned making this per-service, but I see that is not the case here. Do you have an argument against doing so?
I'm specifically thinking of the way we do refs/pull at GitHub (which we hide only from receive-pack). I know that you think it would be cleaner to hide those, and at some level I agree. But at the same time, the current mechanism has been in place for some time; changing what we present via upload-pack is likely to break people's workflows. And I have not seen complaints about the current system. So unless there is a compelling reason to do so, I'd rather let the fetcher make the decision.
Gerrit's refs/changes may be a different story, if they have a large enough number of them to make upload-pack's ref advertisement overwhelming.
I'm happy to do the per-service patch on top, but I just expected it here, so I'm wondering if you are against having the feature.
-Peff