Re: [PATCH] fix some clang warnings
- From
John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
- Date
- Jan 16, 2013, 18:12 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20130116181203.GB2476@farnsworth.metanate.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20130116180041.GC27525@sigill.intra.peff.net>
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:00:42AM -0800, Jeff King wrote:
Show 16 quoted lines
> It is not about the macro itself, but rather the callsites that do not
> return error, but call it for its printing side effect. It seems that
> clang -Wunused-value is OK with unused values from functions being
> discarded, but not with constants. So:
>
> int foo();
> void bar()
> {
> foo(); /* ok */
> 1; /* not ok */
> (foo(), 1); /* not ok */
> }
>
> The first one is OK (I think it would fall under -Wunused-result under
> either compiler). The middle one is an obvious error, and caught by both
> compilers. The last one is OK by gcc, but clang complains.I wonder if this would be changed in clang - the change in [1] is superficially similar.
[1] http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=13747