git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: Workflow for templates?

From
JWJosef Wolf <jw@raven.inka.de>
Date
Nov 6, 2012, 19:50 UTC
Message-ID
<20121106195045.GD28437@raven.wolf.lan>
In-Reply-To
<20121031104403.GC28437@raven.wolf.lan>
No suggestions on this one?
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:44:04AM +0100, Josef Wolf wrote:
Show 62 quoted lines
> I am somewhat unsure whether it would work this way. After all, there seems to
> be an unbreakable rule with git: never rebase published branches.
> 
> Thus, once I have published my work to other people who also need to work on
> the same localizations as I do, I have no longer the option of rebasing to get
> rid of the localizations and put the generic template stuff for upstream.
> 
> I guess, my concern is because I have not yet fully understood the problems of
> rebasing, and how to recover from them.
> 
> Maybe I should try to explain the problem in terms of repository
> hierarchy. Let's assume, there is this hierarchy of repositories:
> 
> upstream: central repository, containing the generic template
> 
> foo-site: repository for site foo. Here we have localizations for a specific
>           administrative entity named foo (say, google).
>           This is where clones for production are made from, and production
>           boxes pull from here to be kept up-to-date.
> 
> foo-prodA: A clone of foo-site, put in production and pulling from a specific
>            branch on foo-site to receive released, blessed updates.
> foo-prodB: Similar to foo-prodA, but on another box.
>            
> foo-devA: A clone of foo-site to make development, releases, and whatever for
>           foo.
> foo-devB: One more clone of foo-site, Developer B is working here.
> 
> Then, we might have more administrative entities: bar-site, bar-prodA,
> bar-prodB, bar-devA, bar-devB, for example. This might be Microsoft, for
> example.
> 
> Further, foo-devA might be the same person as bar-devA.
> 
> So when foo-devA pulls from foo-devB, then foo-devB will create problems when
> he rebases after that pull.
> 
> I think I have some kind of misunderstanding here, but I just can't figure
> what it is.
> 
> 
> Maybe I should try to explain the problem in yet other words:
> 
> What I am trying to achieve, is to extend the workflow from development to
> deployment across multiple administrative entities. As a picture:
> 
>   upstream     (templates only).
>      ^
>      |
>      v
>   development  (configured, might contain experimental changes)
>      ^
>      |
>      v
>   deployment   (configured)
> 
> This workflow should not stop at administrative borders. Just replace foo by
> google and bar by Microsoft to get an idea of what I am trying to achieve.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous: Josef WolfNext: Pyeron, Jason J CTR (US)
Message 4 of 12 in “Workflow for templates?”
  1. Josef WolfOct 25, 2012
  2. Enrico WeigeltOct 27, 2012
  3. Josef WolfOct 31, 2012
  4. Josef WolfNov 6, 2012
  5. Pyeron, Jason J CTR (US)Nov 6, 2012
  6. Josef WolfNov 6, 2012
  7. Holger Hellmuth (IKS)Nov 7, 2012
  8. Enrico WeigeltNov 10, 2012
  9. Enrico WeigeltNov 10, 2012
  10. Philip OakleyNov 10, 2012
  11. Enrico WeigeltNov 10, 2012
  12. Philip OakleyNov 10, 2012

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.