Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] fast-export: don't handle uninteresting refs
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Oct 30, 2012, 22:07 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20121030220717.GO15167@elie.Belkin>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAMP44s1b+E8a0kdSgREbGzRTFy+nCw4VcjHadd3soQAXRkNzZw@mail.gmail.com>
Felipe Contreras wrote:
> Well, that's what we have now, and you want to preserve this "feature" > (aka bug), right?
Nope. I just don't want regressions, and found a patch description that did nothing to explain to the reader how it avoids regressions more than a little disturbing.
I also think the proposed behavior is wrong.
I don't think there's much benefit to be gained from continuing to discuss this. Consider it a single data point: I would be deeply worried if this patch were applied without at least a clearer description of the change in behavior. Maybe I'm the only one!
Hope that helps, Jonathan