Re: git-log combining different detail levels
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Aug 22, 2012, 20:04 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20120822200444.GA27462@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <50353212.7060109@seznam.cz>
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 09:25:06PM +0200, Maaartin-1 wrote:
Show 17 quoted lines
> Quite often I need to see some changes in more detail and others only > briefly, so I get some idea about the context. For example I'd like > something like merging the outputs of > > git log -p -S Bandersnatch > and > git log --name-status --oneline > > together, so I know better what happened. > > A simpler (and maybe more important) example is merging > > git log -p some/dir > and > git log --name-status > > so I could see all the changes, and the chosen ones with all details.
No, I don't think this is possible. We have "--full-diff", which disconnects the path-limiting from the diff generation, so that:
git log --full-diff --name-status some/dir
would choose only commits for some/dir, but show the full diff of each commit.
However, what you are asking is to disconnect the two diff options: one verbose option only for interesting parts of the diff, and then a more sparse option for the rest. I'm pretty sure the diff machinery does not currently understand such an option.
It would not be impossible to implement, I think, but I suspect it would involve refactoring the format selection in the diff code quite a bit. In the meantime, one thing you can do is generate the full diff output and then post-process it to collapse the uninteresting bits. I haven't tried, but you can probably do something like this using "folds" in your editor (e.g., shrink all of the diff content for a file to a single line, but then expand it on demand).
-Peff