threads / discuss / 31321

git-log combining different detail levels

Subject: git-log combining different detail levels

## tl;dr

2 messages between Aug 22, 2012 and Aug 22, 2012.

replies: 1people: 2as markdown or json

Maaartin-1· Aug 22, 2012, 19:25 UTC · lore
Quite often I need to see some changes in more detail and others only briefly, so I get some idea about the context. For example I'd like something like merging the outputs of

git log -p -S Bandersnatch and git log --name-status --oneline

together, so I know better what happened.
A simpler (and maybe more important) example is merging

git log -p some/dir and git log --name-status

so I could see all the changes, and the chosen ones with all details.
Is this somehow possible?
Regards, Maaartin.
Jeff King· Aug 22, 2012, 20:04 UTC · re: Maaartin-1 · lore

Re: git-log combining different detail levels

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 09:25:06PM +0200, Maaartin-1 wrote:
Show 17 quoted lines
> Quite often I need to see some changes in more detail and others only
> briefly, so I get some idea about the context. For example I'd like
> something like merging the outputs of
> 
> git log -p -S Bandersnatch
> and
> git log --name-status --oneline
> 
> together, so I know better what happened.
> 
> A simpler (and maybe more important) example is merging
> 
> git log -p some/dir
> and
> git log --name-status
> 
> so I could see all the changes, and the chosen ones with all details.

No, I don't think this is possible. We have "--full-diff", which disconnects the path-limiting from the diff generation, so that:

  git log --full-diff --name-status some/dir

would choose only commits for some/dir, but show the full diff of each commit.

However, what you are asking is to disconnect the two diff options: one verbose option only for interesting parts of the diff, and then a more sparse option for the rest. I'm pretty sure the diff machinery does not currently understand such an option.

It would not be impossible to implement, I think, but I suspect it would involve refactoring the format selection in the diff code quite a bit. In the meantime, one thing you can do is generate the full diff output and then post-process it to collapse the uninteresting bits. I haven't tried, but you can probably do something like this using "folds" in your editor (e.g., shrink all of the diff content for a file to a single line, but then expand it on demand).

-Peff

← back to recent threads