Re: [PATCH 2/7] Change canonicalize_url() to use the SVN 1.7 API when available.
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 28, 2012, 20:02 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20120728200047.GA4188@burratino>
- In-Reply-To
- <20120728195733.GC3107@burratino>
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Michael G Schwern wrote:
>> I would suggest that worrying whether a few lines of code are introduced now >> or 10 patches later in the same branch which is all going to be merged in one >> go (and retesting the patches after it) is not the most important thing.
[...]
Show 7 quoted lines
> In that case they should be one patch, I'd think. > > The advantage of introducing changes gradually is that (1) the changes > can be examined and tested one at a time, and (2) if later a change > proves to be problematic, it can be isolated, understood, and fixed > more easily. The strategy you are suggesting would have neither of > those advantages.
(To avoid confusion: by "The strategy you are suggesting" I mean introducing dead code first and activating it later, not the path and url object idea. The path and url object approach would be very nice. :))
Sorry for the lack of clarity. Jonathan