Re: [RFC] l10n: de.po: translate 29 new messages

> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Michael J Gruber
> <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> wrote:
> > Ralf Thielow venit, vidit, dixit 05.07.2012 20:16:
> >>>>> Is "rebase" = "Neuaufbau"? My last thought on this wording was "rebase" =
> >>>>> "Umpflanzen".
> >>>
> >>> "Basisumbau"?
> >>>
> >>
> >> I have added both suggestions to the glossary that they don't get lost when
> >> we discuss about non-optimal and/or missing parts within the glossary.
> >
> > Not the base is being reconstructed, but what's on top of it. So,
> > "Basiswechsel" would be more appropriate.
> >
> 
> I agree with you. There is no question what it means, but what are
> the best german words for it.
> 
> > But: "Umpflanzen" is really a great term which stays within the context
> > of trees, roots and branches. Strictly speaking, "Umpflanzen" refers to
> > something you do at the root level. The corresponding action for
> > branches would be "Umpfropfen". I think that also conveys the effort
> > that is sometimes necessary ;)
> 
> "Neuaufbau": it contains the concept of rebase
> "Umpflanzen": it contains the concept of rebase
> "Umpfropfen": Actually, this word isn't familiar to me. It's a bit
> unusual, isn't it?
> (but it might contains the concept of rebase)
> 
> The whole point is that the user needs to know what it actually meant
> in git-context.
> If a user read "sie pflanzen gerade um" or "sie pfropfen gerade um", I
> don't think that
> this is the best solution. I haven't said that "sie bauen gerade neu
> auf" is the optimal one,
> for me it's better, though.
> 
> We really need to discuss (and thats indeed also an issue on other
> translation teams), which
> git (or SCM) related words we shouldn't translate at all.