Re: [PATCH] Fixed compilation with Visual Studio by including poll.h
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Apr 20, 2012, 23:23 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20120420232319.GA14109@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqty0ekr5t.fsf@junio.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 02:51:58PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> > It looks like we will prefer sys/poll.h if it exists. The official XSI > > location is "poll.h", but I guess in practice they are equivalent on > > most systems if you have both (certainly on Linux, poll.h just includes > > sys/poll.h). > > There actually is no preference between the two from _our_ side. It is > up to the builder to know and define necessary make variables.
I say "prefer" only because if you set nothing, you get "sys/poll.h". So it is up to the builder to say "no, I do not have that non-standard location. Use the standard one instead". Which seems a little backwards.
Of course "standard" here is just what POSIX says; sys/poll.h may be much more standard in the real world (I don't know).
Show 7 quoted lines
> > Does your environments have a sys/poll.h that exists isn't sufficient to > > use poll? Maybe we need to tweak git-compat-util to include both if they > > both exist. > > Both? I guess, but I suspect that on most sane systems one would > include the other if there are both provided (iow, just so that you can > complile sources written both for XSI and for systems in the field).
I would think one or the other would be fine. But the fact that Sven's patch works makes me think that he has sys/poll.h, but it is not sufficient. Hopefully including "poll.h" would be enough, but it's not clear to me.
-Peff