Re: [PATCH 3/4] git-commit-am: Allow automatic rebasing to preserve empty commits
- From
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
- Date
- Mar 31, 2012, 13:03 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20120331130308.GD2409@neilslaptop.think-freely.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v8vihlssj.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 01:47:56PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 39 quoted lines
> Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> writes: > > > Using the keep_empy environment variable, this change allows git-commit-am to > > apply empty commits to the new branch we are rebasing to > > > > Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> > > CC: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> > > CC: Phil Hord <phil.hord@gmail.com> > > CC: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> > > --- > > git-rebase--am.sh | 20 +++++++++++++++----- > > 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/git-rebase--am.sh b/git-rebase--am.sh > > index c815a24..c1d1b60 100644 > > --- a/git-rebase--am.sh > > +++ b/git-rebase--am.sh > > @@ -20,11 +20,21 @@ esac > > > > test -n "$rebase_root" && root_flag=--root > > > > -git format-patch -k --stdout --full-index --ignore-if-in-upstream \ > > - --src-prefix=a/ --dst-prefix=b/ \ > > - --no-renames $root_flag "$revisions" | > > -git am $git_am_opt --rebasing --resolvemsg="$resolvemsg" && > > -move_to_original_branch > > +if [ -n "$keep_empty" ] > > +then > > + # we have to do this the hard way. git format-patch completly squashes > > + # empty commits and even if it didn't the format doesn't really lend > > + # itself well to recording empty patches. fortunately, cherry-pick > > + # makes this easy > > + git cherry-pick --keep-empty "$revisions" && move_to_original_branch > > Does cherry-pick know the "--ignore-if-in-upstream" trick? Otherwise I > suspect that this will introduce a severe regression to the command, as > the commits that are already in the new base you are rebasing to will all > be kept as empty commits, no? >
Hmm, you may be correct. I'd not really thought of that. I can borrow the format-patch code for that option and incorporate it into cherry-pick to fix that up. Would that be sufficient?
Neil