Re: [PATCH] Specify a precision for the length of a subject string
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Dec 23, 2011, 23:02 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20111223230228.GA1718@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v1urvc8fb.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 12:58:00PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> > Here's how I would have done it. Not involving %w at all, but applying > > equally to all placeholders. > > Hmm, just curious why you rejected the %w() approach, as enhancing %w > sounded to me like a better approach at the design level, but that was a > knee-jerk reaction without inspecting the codepaths involved myself hence > not knowing the potential amount of work required.
Not so much rejecting as I took a quick look at how I would have done what your original patch did, and it was simple enough that I took it all the way to working and decided to post it. I left it up to you to decide whether using %w would be more sensible. I just wanted to present another alternative for discussion.
-Peff