[PATCH 11/14] progress: allow pure-throughput progress meters
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Nov 10, 2011, 07:53 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20111110075300.GK27950@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20111110074330.GA27925@sigill.intra.peff.net>
The progress code assumes we are counting something (usually objects), even if we are measuring throughput. This works for fetching packfiles, since they show us the object count alongside the throughput, like:
Receiving objects: 2% (301/11968), 22.00 MiB | 10.97 MiB/s
You can also tell the progress code you don't know how many items you have (by specifying a total of 0), and it looks like:
Counting objects: 34957
However, if you're fetching a single large item, you want throughput but you might not have a meaningful count. You can say you are getting item 0 or 1 out of 1 total, but then the percent meter is misleading:
Downloading: 0% (0/1), 22.00 MiB | 10.97 MiB/s
or
Downloading: 100% (0/1), 22.00 MiB | 10.97 MiB/s
Neither of those is accurate. You are probably somewhere between zero and 100 percent through the operation, but you don't know how far.
Telling it you don't know how many items is even uglier:
Downloading: 1, 22.00 MiB | 10.97 MiB/s
Instead, this patch will omit the count entirely if you are on the zero-th item of an unknown number of items. It looks like:
Downloading: 22.00 MiB | 10.97 MiB/s
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> --- This was the last amount of work to massage the progress code into doing what I wanted. It might be nicer if it could show a percentage (if we know the total size), but there's even more surgery required for that.
progress.c | 20 ++++++++++++-------- 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/progress.c b/progress.c index 3971f49..92fc3c5 100644 --- a/progress.c +++ b/progress.c @@ -103,7 +103,10 @@ static int display(struct progress *progress, unsigned n, const char *done) return 1; } } else if (progress_update) { - fprintf(stderr, "%s: %u%s%s", progress->title, n, tp, eol); + fprintf(stderr, "%s: ", progress->title); + if (n) + fprintf(stderr, "%u", n); + fprintf(stderr, "%s%s", tp, eol); fflush(stderr); progress_update = 0; return 1; @@ -113,23 +116,24 @@ static int display(struct progress *progress, unsigned n, const char *done) } static void throughput_string(struct throughput *tp, off_t total, - unsigned int rate) + unsigned int rate, struct progress *p) { + const char *delim = p->total || p->last_value > 0 ? ", " : ""; int l = sizeof(tp->display); if (total > 1 << 30) { - l -= snprintf(tp->display, l, ", %u.%2.2u GiB", + l -= snprintf(tp->display, l, "%s%u.%2.2u GiB", delim, (int)(total >> 30), (int)(total & ((1 << 30) - 1)) / 10737419); } else if (total > 1 << 20) { int x = total + 5243; /* for rounding */ - l -= snprintf(tp->display, l, ", %u.%2.2u MiB", + l -= snprintf(tp->display, l, "%s%u.%2.2u MiB", delim, x >> 20, ((x & ((1 << 20) - 1)) * 100) >> 20); } else if (total > 1 << 10) { int x = total + 5; /* for rounding */ - l -= snprintf(tp->display, l, ", %u.%2.2u KiB", + l -= snprintf(tp->display, l, "%s%u.%2.2u KiB", delim, x >> 10, ((x & ((1 << 10) - 1)) * 100) >> 10); } else { - l -= snprintf(tp->display, l, ", %u bytes", (int)total); + l -= snprintf(tp->display, l, "%s%u bytes", delim, (int)total); } if (rate > 1 << 10) { @@ -197,7 +201,7 @@ void display_throughput(struct progress *progress, off_t total) tp->last_misecs[tp->idx] = misecs; tp->idx = (tp->idx + 1) % TP_IDX_MAX; - throughput_string(tp, total, rate); + throughput_string(tp, total, rate, progress); if (progress->last_value != -1 && progress_update) display(progress, progress->last_value, NULL); } @@ -255,7 +259,7 @@ void stop_progress_msg(struct progress **p_progress, const char *msg) if (tp) { unsigned int rate = !tp->avg_misecs ? 0 : tp->avg_bytes / tp->avg_misecs; - throughput_string(tp, tp->curr_total, rate); + throughput_string(tp, tp->curr_total, rate, progress); } progress_update = 1; sprintf(bufp, ", %s.\n", msg);
-- 1.7.7.2.7.g9f96f