Re: [PATCH 2/3] fetch: honor the user-provided refspecs when pruning refs
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Oct 7, 2011, 16:39 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20111007163936.GA5212@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <1318005433.4579.5.camel@centaur.lab.cmartin.tk>
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 06:37:13PM +0200, Carlos Martín Nieto wrote:
> > I assume you mean s/tag/branch/ in the last line? > > Yeah, maybe ref would be better?
Yeah, agreed.
> > Tests? > > Good point.
It sounds like you already have a reproduction recipe for this, and for the --tags thing in the next commit.
> OK, so take a step back and figure out what we want the rules to be > before we call get_stale_heads. It does sound like a more elegant > approach. I was trying to disrupt the callers as little as possible, but > then again, there's only two. Will change.
Yeah. Sometimes we try hard to make a minimal patch, because it makes it easier to review. At the same time, I think it's more important to make the code clean if it needs it. Especially when there aren't many callers to disrupt.
-Peff