Re: [PATCH] for-each-ref: add split message parts to %(contents:*).
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Sep 1, 2011, 18:19 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20110901181905.GA17551@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vwrdsw5ci.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 10:16:29AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes: > > > We could either leave %(subject) with its historical behavior, or fix it > > to handle multi-line subjects. Although it's technically a regression to > > change it, I tend to think it is simply a bug, as it doesn't match what > > the rest of git (like "git log --format=%s") does. > > I think %(subject) should be updated to match %(contents:subject) as a > bugfix, so %(body) should be adjusted to prevent "%(subject)%(body)" from > duplicating lines.
OK. That makes it much easier to implement, too, I think. :)
> Side note. We probably would want to borrow from pretty-formats to allow > us to say %(subject)%(+body) or something...
I have been meaning to take a closer look at Will Palmer's patches for making the pretty-formats look more like the for-each-ref formats (which I think would be the first step to unifying the features). But somehow months have slipped by, and I haven't yet.
But I think unifying the formats and the code is better than trying to port features across.
-Peff