Re: [RFC] control, what refs are honored by core.logAllRefUpdates
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 12, 2011, 22:21 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20110712222129.GA15994@elie>
- In-Reply-To
- <20110712182517.GA17787@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King wrote:
Show 13 quoted lines
> I think I'd rather see something more syntactically explicit for > resetting, though, like: > > [core] > autoLogRef = heads > autoLogRef = remotes > autoLogRef = notes > !autoLogRef > autoLogref = heads > > (for that matter, I have often wished that "!autoLogRef" was boolean > false, just as "autoLogRef" is boolean true). But it may not be worth > changing the config syntax for.
Sounds worthwhile to me. I've (probably irrationally) wished before for an abbreviation for "bare = false", too.