From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 22:21:29 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC] control, what refs are honored by core.logAllRefUpdates
Message-ID: <20110712222129.GA15994@elie>
In-Reply-To: <20110712182517.GA17787@sigill.intra.peff.net>

Jeff King wrote:

> I think I'd rather see something more syntactically explicit for
> resetting, though, like:
>
>   [core]
>     autoLogRef = heads
>     autoLogRef = remotes
>     autoLogRef = notes
>     !autoLogRef
>     autoLogref = heads
>
> (for that matter, I have often wished that "!autoLogRef" was boolean
> false, just as "autoLogRef" is boolean true). But it may not be worth
> changing the config syntax for.

Sounds worthwhile to me.  I've (probably irrationally) wished before
for an abbreviation for "bare = false", too.