Re: [PATCH 0/8] Sequencer Foundations
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 12, 2011, 11:44 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20110512114415.GA14724@elie>
- In-Reply-To
- <20110512084136.GD28872@elie>
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Christian Couder wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
>> I think that the risk at this point might be to overengineer things >> and to lose time, and then we will perhaps find out that we need to do >> some refactoring of the merge_recursive API anyway. > > I agree with the general principle... let's see if I understand the > details of what you are saying.
It occurs to me now that you were probably talking about the suggestion of using the lockfile API (i.e., the write temporary/rename trick). In that case, I agree --- no need to overengineer it and concurrency problems can be fixed later. Sorry for an overcomplicated explanation.
And thanks for looking out for these things.