Re: The future of gitweb - part 2: JavaScript

From: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Date: Apr 17, 2011, 20:14 UTC
Message-ID: <20110417201421.GV3258@machine.or.cz>
In-Reply-To: <201104141154.55078.jnareb@gmail.com>

Hi!

On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:54:53AM +0200, Jakub Narebski wrote:

Show 8 quoted lines

> Unfortunately the decision to use JavaScript framework brings its own
> new problems.
> 
> First issue is which JavaScript framework or library to use:
> * jQuery (lightweight, most popular, used e.g. by MediaWiki)
> * MooTools (lightweight, 2nd most popular, opbject-oriented)
> * YUI, The Yahoo! User Interface Library 
> * other: Prototype, Dojo, ExtJS, SproutCore,...

  Girocco uses MooTools, and I also used it in an old private branch
of gitweb. I have had pretty good experience with it. But since I wasn't
able to find anyone to maintain Girocco's gitweb (or even keep it in
sync with upstream) and the patch flow to core git has dried up, it's
probably not too relevant argument. :-)

> So what are your ideas and comments on the issue of JavaScript code
> and JavaScript libraries / frameworks in gitweb?

  It seems most common sense to use CDN by default but allow providing
pre-downloaded file with the library at build time as an alternative.

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are.