Re: textconv not invoked when viewing merge commit
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Apr 16, 2011, 01:47 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20110416014758.GB23306@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v7havckgg.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 01:45:35PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 13 quoted lines
> Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr> writes: > > >> I can't think of a case where it matters, though, so maybe it is just > >> paranoia. > > > > A line-counting, statistics tool would think that 1 line has been > > removed from both branches, and one new added by the merge. > > > > Well, I know no tool parsing combined diff actually, so it's indeed a > > hypothetical case. > > And the ones that have been parsing cdiff wouldn't have done anything good > before this change on such a binary blob anyway, no?
No, but we can view the proposed change as fixing a bug for such a tool Whereas turning it into:
--Binary blob XXX + Binary blob YYY +Binary blob ZZZ
is codifying ambiguous output, and making the tool forever broken.
-Peff