Re: textconv not invoked when viewing merge commit
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Apr 14, 2011, 19:28 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20110414192839.GA6001@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vipughbxh.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 12:26:18PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes: > > > We just dump the binary goo all over the terminal. So I think the whole > > combined-diff code path needs to learn how to handle binaries properly. > > How would you show multi-way diffs for binary files?
No clue. But anything would be better than pretending it's line oriented and dumping binary goo to the terminal.
> It would probably be sufficient to say "binary files differ" at the > beginning of the patch-combining codepath of the combined diff, which > would at least keep the --raw -c/--cc output working.
Yeah, something like "binary files differ" would probably be OK for "-c". I think for "--cc", that is probably the best we can do, too. It is about condensing uninteresting hunks, but we don't even have the concept of hunks.
-Peff