Re: [PATCH] Document 'git bisect fix'.
- From
- Yann Dirson <dirson@bertin.fr>
- Date
- Mar 16, 2011, 13:34 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20110316143402.69e66f16@chalon.bertin.fr>
Show 8 quoted lines
>I'd say the replace method is perfect for transporting an existing fix >"back in time" when the range of non-bisectable commits is limited. But >since you have to replace the right (most recent) commit in that range >it is less convenient when you have a fix due to a changed/exotic build >environment or such which you do not want in your mainline. > >Also, you have to rebase the whole history back to the commit which >introduced the problem
Right, and that makes it much more difficult when you want to be selective about which fixes you want to apply.
-- Yann Dirson - Bertin Technologies