From: Yann Dirson <dirson@bertin.fr>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 13:34:02 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Document 'git bisect fix'.
Message-ID: <20110316143402.69e66f16@chalon.bertin.fr>

>I'd say the replace method is perfect for transporting an existing fix
>"back in time" when the range of non-bisectable commits is limited. But
>since you have to replace the right (most recent) commit in that range
>it is less convenient when you have a fix due to a changed/exotic build
>environment or such which you do not want in your mainline.
>
>Also, you have to rebase the whole history back to the commit which
>introduced the problem

Right, and that makes it much more difficult when you want to be
selective about which fixes you want to apply.

-- 
Yann Dirson - Bertin Technologies