Re: Fwd: [PATCH 2/2] pretty.c: allow date formats in user format strings
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Mar 10, 2011, 22:31 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20110310223148.GD15828@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v39mw9f7a.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 01:06:17PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> > Agreed. And I think it is possible to do it in a backwards-compatible > > way; support %(longname:options) for everything, and keep short-hands > > like %h and %ad for existing elements without options. > > Yes, I think %( is not taken in the pretty-format language, so we should > be able to do this. > > I wanted to take your earlier "'%ad' or '%ad(format)'" patch but refrained > from doing so. The above line of reasoning is much better for the long > term health of the project.
OK. Do you want me to throw away the %ad(format) patch for now, then, in favor of building it on top of a more sane syntax?
I had originally planned to do %ad(format) for now, and then worry about syntax later. Since we already have a variety of of other placeholders with similar syntax (e.g., %w(), %C()). But I don't care too much either way; it is not a feature I personally wanted, so delay doesn't bother me. Dietmar (the original requestor) may feel differently, of course. :)
-Peff