Re: git describe weird behaviour
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 10, 2010, 21:24 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20101110212410.GA13782@burratino>
- In-Reply-To
- <20101110204034.GO22105@genesis.frugalware.org>
Miklos Vajna wrote:
> But I think the approach to follow the first parent only would solve the > problem outlined in the commit message of 80dbae0 as well: I think it's > pretty rare to tag a commit in a feature branch, then merge it.
Doesn't that happen in linux-2.6 history fairly often (subsystem trees syncing with upstream)?