From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 21:24:10 GMT
Subject: Re: git describe weird behaviour
Message-ID: <20101110212410.GA13782@burratino>
In-Reply-To: <20101110204034.GO22105@genesis.frugalware.org>

Miklos Vajna wrote:

> But I think the approach to follow the first parent only would solve the
> problem outlined in the commit message of 80dbae0 as well: I think it's
> pretty rare to tag a commit in a feature branch, then merge it.

Doesn't that happen in linux-2.6 history fairly often (subsystem trees
syncing with upstream)?