Re: Advertising the Git User's Survey 2011
- From
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
- Date
- Oct 3, 2010, 18:07 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20101003180743.GK328@kytes>
- In-Reply-To
- <201010031655.40521.jnareb@gmail.com>
Hi again,
Jakub Narebski writes:
> On Sun, 3 Oct 2010, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: > > Perhaps we can email survs.com and ask them? > > Should I do it, or would you do it?
Er, why will they know who I am and give me this information? You've been in touch with them before, I hope?
Show 6 quoted lines
> > > We could also write how much time it takes on average to fill the survey. > > > > Sounds good. > > Note however that such information is available only after survey is > opened for a bit (unless we use test run statistics).
I suppose that's alright.
Show 19 quoted lines
> > > The other side of removing options from "13. Which git hosting site(s) > > > do you use for your project(s)?" is that when sending requests to > > > announce the survey to those git hosting sites that are not on this > > > list, some of them requested to be added (which is impossible after > > > starting the survey; and before survey begins it is little sense to > > > send announcements). > > > > I see. How are we going to tackle this in future? > > > > > Besides all of those below 1% rounded (Codesion, GitFarm, The Chaw, > > > CipherHive) are also those that I didn't get response to request for > > > announcing Git User's Survey 2010... > > > > Interesting. > > We can always remove (and do not add) those choices for which we don't > get much responses for, and which do not respond to attemts to contact. > Conversely, we probably should add those git hosting sites that we have > many replies in the "other, please specify".
*nod*
Show 8 quoted lines
> > > We could make it more organized though, e.g. by sorting list of options > > > alphabetically, or something like that. > > > > Sounds good. > > Will do, perhaps starting with repo.or.cz (first site), GitHub (most > popular), Gitorious and perhaps Gitolite (OSS engine), and ending with > non-generic sites such as git.kernel.org, Alioth, Fedora Hosted, etc.
*nod*
Show 15 quoted lines
> > > Another solution would be to have pre-filled combo box (<select> field)
> > > with the list of countries to choose from, with GeoIP ised to pre-select
> > > the country. I can generate list of all countries myself
> > >
> > > $ perl -MLocale::Country \
> > > -wle 'print join("\n", sort (all_country_names()))'
> > >
> > > as far as I know Survs.com doesn't offer GeoIP nor any API to hook it
> > > to survey questions.
> >
> > I suppose we could always work out a way to display the results from
> > the information Survs.com gives us.
>
> Do you have any idea how to display such geographical information, and
> what tool to use for that visualization?A quick Google search pointed me to several tools that parse a plaintext file of (lattitude, longitude) entries and use the Google Maps API to plot them. I'm sorry, but I don't know much more about this.
Show 14 quoted lines
> > Nice histogram! How did we manage to do this in 2009? Did we use a > > custom-made application to do the survey? > > I used a Perl script, which uses Text::CSV to parse data exported from > Survs.com in CSV format (and PerlIO::gzip to not have to decompress it). > Each survey page on Git Wiki, except for the very first survey, contains > link to file with such exported data. > > For example for age it extracts digits from the response, and assumes > that it is number of years. It also creates this nice table of ranges > that you can see in the mentioned section of GitSurvey2009 page. > > I can publish this script, e.g. the one used for 2009 survey on the > GitSurvey2009 page, but it is rough'n'dirty script.
Sounds good- we should create a small repository that contains all the tools used, notes made, and results (in semantic format) of previous surveys. Embarrassingly enough, I can't read Perl myself, but I'm sure the others will find it useful. Also, isn't there some Perl module to use Google Maps API to draw that map?
-- Ram