Re: [PATCH 10/25] gettextize: git-merge basic messages
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Sep 2, 2010, 21:13 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20100902211339.GA2801@burratino>
- In-Reply-To
- <AANLkTi=ZQAjA9SN1A3WDr-L2rFA6v-XH0mZAkhuUgdAg@mail.gmail.com>
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> Yeah, I was just hoping I could get away with it :)
To be clear, I think you made a reasonable choice at this stage of development.
Aside: maybe for translation (though not for gettextizing) the idea of patches that get applied to the development tree is more trouble than it's worth. GNU sed and some similar projects do not include translations in the development tree but fetch them from translationproject.org as part of the "bootstrap" procedure when building a source tarball or binaries.
See autoboot in git://git.sv.gnu.org/sed.git for example.