[PATCH 02/17] Documentation: quoting trouble in "git rm" discussion
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Aug 20, 2010, 10:21 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20100820102153.GB10407@burratino>
- In-Reply-To
- <20100820101902.GA10356@burratino>
The current output (with Asciidoc 8.5.2) seems a bit broken:
given two directories ‘d` and d2, there is a difference between using git rm 'd*’ and ‘git rm 'd/\*\’`, as the former will also remove all of directory d2.
In other words, the markup parses as
given two directories << d` and _d2_, there is a difference between using _git rm 'd* >>_ and << git rm 'd/\*\ >> `.
I suspect there is an asciidoc bug involved (why is ' a candidate closing-quote mark when it is preceded by a backslash?) but with all the meanings of ` and ' involved I do not want to track it down. Better to use unambiguous {asterisk} and {apostrophe} entities.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> --- Documentation/asciidoc.conf | 1 + Documentation/git-rm.txt | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/asciidoc.conf b/Documentation/asciidoc.conf index 87a90f2..6be8ba3 100644 --- a/Documentation/asciidoc.conf +++ b/Documentation/asciidoc.conf @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ caret=^ startsb=[ endsb=] tilde=~ +apostrophe=' backtick=` ifdef::backend-docbook[] diff --git a/Documentation/git-rm.txt b/Documentation/git-rm.txt index c21d19e..d146751 100644 --- a/Documentation/git-rm.txt +++ b/Documentation/git-rm.txt @@ -78,7 +78,8 @@ a file that you have not told git about does not remove that file. File globbing matches across directory boundaries. Thus, given two directories `d` and `d2`, there is a difference between -using `git rm \'d\*\'` and `git rm \'d/\*\'`, as the former will +using `git rm {apostrophe}d{asterisk}{apostrophe}` and +`git rm {apostrophe}d/{asterisk}{apostrophe}`, as the former will also remove all of directory `d2`. REMOVING FILES THAT HAVE DISAPPEARED FROM THE FILESYSTEM
-- 1.7.2.2.536.g42dab.dirty