git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [PATCH 1/3] test-lib: Add support for multiple test prerequisites

From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Date
Aug 8, 2010, 01:57 UTC
Message-ID
<20100808015729.GA9284@burratino>
In-Reply-To
<1281129565-26124-2-git-send-email-avarab@gmail.com>
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> Change the test_have_prereq function in test-lib.sh to support a
> comma-separated list of prerequisites. This is useful for tests that
> need e.g. both POSIXPERM and SANITY.
> 
> The implementation was stolen from Junio C Hamano and Johannes Sixt,
> the tests and documentation were not.
I think you can sell it better. :)
	From: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
	Subject: test-lib: Allow tests with multiple prerequisites
	Occasionally an especially taxing test comes around that
	makes multiple assumptions on the system running it.
	Currently the test suite works around that with such hacks as
	 if
		test_have_prereq SYMLINKS &&
		test_have_prereq POSIXPERM
	 then
		test_set_prereq SYMLINKPERM
	 fi
	 test_expect_success SYMLINKPERM 'funny symlink in work tree, un-unlink-able' '
		...
	 '
	or even worse, as in the test that example is based on, leaves
	out mention of the “easier” of the two assumptions.
	Maybe you would be happier to be able to write
	 test_expect_success SYMLINKS,POSIXPERM 'funny symlink' '
		...
	 '
	Based on a patch by Junio.
	[ab: added tests and documentation]
	Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Show 10 quoted lines
> +++ b/t/t0000-basic.sh
> @@ -73,6 +73,23 @@ then
>  	exit 1
>  fi
>  
> +test_set_prereq HAVETHIS
> +haveit=no
> +test_expect_success HAVETHIS,HAVEIT 'test runs if prerequisites are satisfied' '
> +    test_have_prereq HAVEIT &&
> +    test_have_prereq HAVETHIS &&

I think the similar code above was just a way to sneak in a sanity check for test_have_prereq(). I’d leave it out.

Show 11 quoted lines
> +    haveit=yes
> +'
> +donthaveit=yes
> +test_expect_success HAVEIT,DONTHAVEIT 'unmet prerequisites causes test to be skipped' '
> +    donthaveit=no
> +'
> +if test $haveit$donthaveit != yesyes
> +then
> +	say "bug in test framework: multiple prerequisite tags do not work reliably"
> +	exit 1
> +fi
Maybe it would be simpler to squash this in with the other similar checks.
Show 25 quoted lines
> +++ b/t/test-lib.sh
> @@ -327,12 +327,20 @@ test_set_prereq () {
>  satisfied=" "
>  
>  test_have_prereq () {
> -	case $satisfied in
> -	*" $1 "*)
> -		: yes, have it ;;
> -	*)
> -		! : nope ;;
> -	esac
> +	# prerequisites can be concatenated with ','
> +	save_IFS=$IFS
> +	IFS=,
> +	set -- $*
> +	IFS=$save_IFS
> +	for prerequisite
> +	do
> +		case $satisfied in
> +		*" $prerequisite "*)
> +			: yes, have it ;;
> +		*)
> +			! : nope ;;
> +		esac
> +	done
Does that work?
Except as noted above,
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>

Thanks. ---

diff --git a/t/t0000-basic.sh b/t/t0000-basic.sh
index 2887677..cdb25af 100755
--- a/t/t0000-basic.sh
+++ b/t/t0000-basic.sh
@@ -58,35 +58,28 @@ test_expect_failure 'pretend we have fixed a known breakage' '
     :
 '
 test_set_prereq HAVEIT
+test_set_prereq ONE
+test_set_prereq TWO
 haveit=no
 test_expect_success HAVEIT 'test runs if prerequisite is satisfied' '
     test_have_prereq HAVEIT &&
     haveit=yes
 '
+haveboth=no
+test_expect_success ONE,TWO 'test runs if prerequisites are satisfied' '
+    haveboth=yes
+'
 donthaveit=yes
 test_expect_success DONTHAVEIT 'unmet prerequisite causes test to be skipped' '
     donthaveit=no
 '
-if test $haveit$donthaveit != yesyes
-then
-	say "bug in test framework: prerequisite tags do not work reliably"
-	exit 1
-fi
-
-test_set_prereq HAVETHIS
-haveit=no
-test_expect_success HAVETHIS,HAVEIT 'test runs if prerequisites are satisfied' '
-    test_have_prereq HAVEIT &&
-    test_have_prereq HAVETHIS &&
-    haveit=yes
-'
-donthaveit=yes
-test_expect_success HAVEIT,DONTHAVEIT 'unmet prerequisites causes test to be skipped' '
-    donthaveit=no
+donthaveboth=yes
+test_expect_success THREE,ONE 'one unmet prerequisite is enough' '
+    donthaveboth=no
 '
-if test $haveit$donthaveit != yesyes
+if test $haveit$donthaveit$haveboth$donthaveboth != yesyesyesyes
 then
-	say "bug in test framework: multiple prerequisite tags do not work reliably"
+	say "bug in test framework: prerequisite tags do not work reliably"
 	exit 1
 fi
 
diff --git a/t/test-lib.sh b/t/test-lib.sh
index 8701923..a3b0b22 100644
--- a/t/test-lib.sh
+++ b/t/test-lib.sh
@@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ test_have_prereq () {
 		*" $prerequisite "*)
 			: yes, have it ;;
 		*)
-			! : nope ;;
+			return 1
 		esac
 	done
 }
Previous: Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonNext: Jonathan Nieder
Message 3 of 8 in “tests: Better prerequisite handling & documentation”
  1. 0/3 tests: Better prerequisite handling & documentationÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason, Aug 6, 2010
  2. 1/3 test-lib: Add support for multiple test prerequisitesÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason, Aug 6, 2010
  3. Jonathan NiederAug 8, 2010
  4. Jonathan NiederAug 8, 2010
  5. Johannes SixtAug 8, 2010
  6. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonAug 8, 2010
  7. 2/3 test-lib: Print missing prerequisites in test outputÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason, Aug 6, 2010
  8. 3/3 t/README: Document the predefined test prerequisitesÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason, Aug 6, 2010

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.