[PATCH 1/2] Add a string_list_foreach macro
- From
Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 2, 2010, 20:54 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20100702205417.GA4941@blimp.localdomain>
- In-Reply-To
- <AANLkTilj7MiqiCmptDw0PLM5QqKZOOSZnSsxMlELS_5_@mail.gmail.com>
This is more lightweight than for_each_string_list function with callback function and a cookie argument.
Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com> ---
Alex Riesen, Tue, Jun 29, 2010 10:35:15 +0200:
Show 10 quoted lines
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 10:33, Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com> wrote: > > BTW, now that I took a look at it... The iteration over string_list > > items looks a little overengineered. At least from the point of > > view of the existing users of the feature. Wouldn't a simple loop > > be just as simple to use (if not simplier) and faster (no uninlineable > > function calls and argument preparation and passing needed)? > > > > #define string_list_foreach(item,list) \ > > for (item = (list)->items; item < (list)->items + (list)->nr; ++item) > >
Rebased on current head (after Julian Philips patches).
string-list.h | 2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/string-list.h b/string-list.h index 680d600..acf0450 100644 --- a/string-list.h +++ b/string-list.h @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ void string_list_clear_func(struct string_list *list, string_list_clear_func_t c typedef int (*string_list_each_func_t)(struct string_list_item *, void *); int for_each_string_list(struct string_list *list, string_list_each_func_t, void *cb_data); +#define string_list_foreach(item,list) \ + for (item = (list)->items; item < (list)->items + (list)->nr; ++item) /* Use these functions only on sorted lists: */ int string_list_has_string(const struct string_list *list, const char *string);
-- 1.7.1.304.g8446