Re: [PATCH GSoC 2/3] git-instaweb: Configure it to work with a global server root and projects list
- From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 19, 2010, 16:48 UTC
- Message-ID
- <201005191848.49922.jnareb@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <AANLkTimFrX6yE69ZNlZM11XJVNLS5rpbsdeNN984iNs7@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 19 May 2010, Pavan Kumar Sunkara wrote:
> On Wed, 19 May 2010 01:05:57 +0200, Jakub Narebski wrote:
Show 15 quoted lines
> > Well, I can understand that. > > > > There are two options how to resolve this issue without adding yet > > another script (although on the other hand git-web-gui / git-client > > could share code with git-instaweb just like git-difftool and > > git-mergetool do). > > > > First is to leave git-instaweb similar to how it is now, with pid file, > > server config file, gitweb config file, etc. in $GIT_DIR/gitweb, but > > if it is invoked outside any git repository, start it in "repository > > administration" mode, i.e. on the page that allows one to create new > > repository or clone repository. > > But this solution requires starting of many apache servers on many > ports which is quite complicated and even messier.
I agree with that. I guess that git-instaweb was created mainly for the situation where you work in single repository, and does not support well situation where you move from repository to repository, and run git-instaweb in different repositories.
As I wrote earlier:
Now, current git-instaweb behavior has its quirks, but having git-instaweb show _current_ repository is a very important feature, and I'd rather we didn't lose it in transition.
Show 8 quoted lines
> > The alternate solution would be to follow the idea implemented in this > > patch, namely per-user pid file, gitweb config file, server config file > > etc. and the *list of projects* file in $HOME/.gitweb (or whenever > > XDG / FHS / LSB says it should be named), _but_ add an easy way to add > > a new project (a new repositoey) to list. > > The feature *Adding repository to client* in my project proposal will > take care of this.
That's good, but...
Show 6 quoted lines
> > Perhaps even make > > 'git instaweb', when run from inside git repository, add automatically > > current repository to list (unless it is present there already), and > > perhaps open 'summary' page for said repository. > > Yeah, we can do that but I think I will do it in another commit.
...this is really needed, in my opinion.
I agree that it should be in separate commit.
-- Jakub Narebski Poland