Re: [PATCH] commit: match explicit-ident semantics for summary and template
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Jan 18, 2010, 01:47 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20100118014735.GA6831@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <7viqb0xubf.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 02:03:48PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> We could say something like > > if (!(user_ident_explicitly_given & IDENT_EMAIL_GIVEN)) > > and it probably is a safer change on platforms with GECOS available, but > then wouldn't msysgit folks have to fork this code?
I hadn't thought to be specific to "email must be given". That is, I had assumed if you gave a name but not email, you would also be considered competent enough to avoid the warning. But I really can't see anybody doing that, so the semantics you suggest above are fine by me.
As far as Windows goes, I have no opinion on the correct behavior. But if they are going to do something different, your encapsulation makes sense to me.
-Peff